i'm sure i'm not the only one who has heard this: "well, you didn't really quit smoking because you're vaping."
it seems i've gotten that only from non-smokers and it's a bit of a disappointment. smokers seem to consider my switching to vaping as "quitting" but non-smokers seem to have a different, mostly antagonistic, take on it. i believe i would not get that reaction if i said i had gone so long without a cigarette while using the patch or nicotine gum, but there's this opposition to vaping.
i think it's partly because it gives off the impression that smokers are having their cake and eating it too. meaning a nicotine fix without the high chance of cancer, emphysema, etc. it just seems too good that somehow smokers found a loophole where they can still be breathing out clouds of something that looks like smoke with a pleasant taste, that takes care of your need for nicotine and (holy moly!) can even be used indoors in many non-smoking places. there's a certain "that can't be right" attitude i've gotten.
i've explained in detail studies on propylene glycol --particularly for those who bring up the "anti-freeze" meme and so on, but in return i get a reduction ad absurdum argument that turns into possible carcinogenics in both natural and artificial flavoring. --and this comes from people who don't avoid artificial flavoring in the food they eat. somehow i feel safe to say that i don't think these people would begin arguing with me about the fact that there are no long term studies on the adhesives used on the patch or similar hair splitting issues. the attitude is just that it sounds too easy for smokers. it looks like they are smoking so there must be something really bad about it, even if we don't know what.
hey, i'm all for further research on inhaling natural and artificial flavors, i do know that some artificial flavorings are bad for you and your lungs (such as some butter flavorings used in microwave popcorn), but i can't seem to get the idea across of the amazing benefits of harm reduction in switching to vaping. to me that's the most important thing. i realize that i'm still addicted to nicotine but i also think this is the farthest i've ever gone from freeing me from the smoking habit and that if it wasn't for vaping i'd still be smoking almost two packs a day and suffering the consequences.
so my question here is, how do you deal with this? and by that i mean other than arguing. you can never convince anyone of anything by trying to force them into a corner. you can possibly get them to admit that you are right on certain points but you just put them on the defensive and inside their opinions don't change much.
is there a good metaphor that people can understand easily? by that i mean something along the lines of vaping being the equivalent of sugar free candy for diabetics or soy burgers for vegans or something around those lines.
it seems i've gotten that only from non-smokers and it's a bit of a disappointment. smokers seem to consider my switching to vaping as "quitting" but non-smokers seem to have a different, mostly antagonistic, take on it. i believe i would not get that reaction if i said i had gone so long without a cigarette while using the patch or nicotine gum, but there's this opposition to vaping.
i think it's partly because it gives off the impression that smokers are having their cake and eating it too. meaning a nicotine fix without the high chance of cancer, emphysema, etc. it just seems too good that somehow smokers found a loophole where they can still be breathing out clouds of something that looks like smoke with a pleasant taste, that takes care of your need for nicotine and (holy moly!) can even be used indoors in many non-smoking places. there's a certain "that can't be right" attitude i've gotten.
i've explained in detail studies on propylene glycol --particularly for those who bring up the "anti-freeze" meme and so on, but in return i get a reduction ad absurdum argument that turns into possible carcinogenics in both natural and artificial flavoring. --and this comes from people who don't avoid artificial flavoring in the food they eat. somehow i feel safe to say that i don't think these people would begin arguing with me about the fact that there are no long term studies on the adhesives used on the patch or similar hair splitting issues. the attitude is just that it sounds too easy for smokers. it looks like they are smoking so there must be something really bad about it, even if we don't know what.
hey, i'm all for further research on inhaling natural and artificial flavors, i do know that some artificial flavorings are bad for you and your lungs (such as some butter flavorings used in microwave popcorn), but i can't seem to get the idea across of the amazing benefits of harm reduction in switching to vaping. to me that's the most important thing. i realize that i'm still addicted to nicotine but i also think this is the farthest i've ever gone from freeing me from the smoking habit and that if it wasn't for vaping i'd still be smoking almost two packs a day and suffering the consequences.
so my question here is, how do you deal with this? and by that i mean other than arguing. you can never convince anyone of anything by trying to force them into a corner. you can possibly get them to admit that you are right on certain points but you just put them on the defensive and inside their opinions don't change much.
is there a good metaphor that people can understand easily? by that i mean something along the lines of vaping being the equivalent of sugar free candy for diabetics or soy burgers for vegans or something around those lines.
Last edited: