I've measured my mod Resistance and decided on a figure of 0.0045Ω.
I used my Frankenizer (external atomizer for temp/scope probing) with a short stretch of copper shorting its posts. Measuring the resistance of this entire circuit I get a figure slightly fluctuating but no higher than 0.002Ω.
Then using eScribe, I generally saw a figure of 0.006Ω but sometimes, with a slight flex of the cables, it would fluctuate up to 0.007Ω. So I'm going to assume it's reading somewhere close to 0.0065Ω, and use an MR of 0.0045Ω.
Once this was set, Atomizer Analyzer showed the net resistance as 0.002Ω which is correct for the circuit it's attached to.
With the 200's milli-ohm resolution I could be half a milliohm out in either direction. But this is good enough. And I was impressed with the MR only being 0.0045Ω, give or take. I think the brass 510 does help - not that it is staying for future batches - and there's presumably quite thick/short wire internally.

I used my Frankenizer (external atomizer for temp/scope probing) with a short stretch of copper shorting its posts. Measuring the resistance of this entire circuit I get a figure slightly fluctuating but no higher than 0.002Ω.
Then using eScribe, I generally saw a figure of 0.006Ω but sometimes, with a slight flex of the cables, it would fluctuate up to 0.007Ω. So I'm going to assume it's reading somewhere close to 0.0065Ω, and use an MR of 0.0045Ω.
Once this was set, Atomizer Analyzer showed the net resistance as 0.002Ω which is correct for the circuit it's attached to.
With the 200's milli-ohm resolution I could be half a milliohm out in either direction. But this is good enough. And I was impressed with the MR only being 0.0045Ω, give or take. I think the brass 510 does help - not that it is staying for future batches - and there's presumably quite thick/short wire internally.


Last edited: