Don't Kurt. Seriously man, recognize what you are reading and let it go. Your last rant was probably therapeutic for you but don't waste any more effort on it. It's not going to change things.
I say let him keep going, the mods will ban him in no time and the rest of us can keep on getting along and helping each other positively like we always have.
MSDS has no relevancy. Are those tests performed after they transfer it to their containers? What is the baseline acceptable purity for e-cigarette usage, along with all the separate chemicals tested for?
MSDS don't matter, but COA's do. And in order to be in accord with the USP certification, the packaging must follow the standards outlined in the USP. This includes shipping and repackaging.
Links. I've searched for the term USP grade. It has nothing to do with Pharmaceutical Grade, and actually there is no information on the term you keep pushing USP grade.
Dow makes a Pharmaceutical Grade liquid, listed as USP/EP
Now a chemist telling the community what is acceptable for usage? Nice to know you also practice medicine.
Since the first paragraph has no links to verifiable data, only the same crap you've been spewing which I've already proven is wrong, then the rest TL DR.
Good luck getting a hold of anything from Dow. They do not allow their products to be sold or distributed to any vendor that has anything to do with vaping. Same thing with Procter and Gamble (who makes "Superol" VG). Neither company is vape friendly and do not allow their distributors to sell to vape supply companies. Of course, it might be possible to get around this, but VG from either vendor isn't easy to come by.
Besides, Puraguard and Optim are not really any more "pure" than any other USP certified 99.7% glycerine.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.