Mine are RATS
Rebuildable
Atomizer
Tank
System
Used on an APV

Rebuildable
Atomizer
Tank
System
Used on an APV
Call it a PV.I've read alot on this subject, and there still seems to be alot of linguistic confusion here.
What should you accurately call a glass and stainless steel tank atomizer that comes with replaceable organic cotton coils that thread onto the chimney? I see alot of people refer to them as RTA's but this makes zero sense to me as half of them aren't rebuildable at all, and the OTHER half that are require the purchase of a specialty RBA coil head that screws onto the chimney to rebuild them and even these don't have decks with posts/postholes? Calling a glass and steel tank atomizer like the joyetech cubis an "RTA" makes absolutely ZERO SENSE to me, so why does everyone keep doing it?
IMHO the most accurate description for this type of tank should be 'glassomizer' as it was the all glass and steel aspire nautilus that first/originally came out with this type of top threaded non-silica wick coil head (originally using silica or ceramic type wool material and later updating to organic cotton, making these OCC coils popular?) Wasn't the aspire nautilus technically a 'glassomizer' guys? Or do I have my history and nomenclature wrong?
Now it could also be argued that an OCC coil head is basically a mini cartomizer as a cartomizer is basically a vertical metal tube with an often vertical coil in the center surrounded by cotton or polyfil, and so a joyetech cubis could be called a cartotank more accurately than it could be called an RTA, but I think glassomizer makes more sense, doesn't it?
What do you guys think about this? Why do people keep calling these types of tanks RTA's and throwing them under the RBA category as well?
I've even heard people refer to these type of OCC coil head tanks as clearomizers which makes about as much sense as calling it an RTA....
anyone want to chime in and clear this up for me?
Thanks!
GEM
If it has coils its proper name is a clearomizer or clearo-tank.
If it has coils its proper name is a coilomizer or coilo-tank.
If it has clears its proper name is a clearomizer or clearo-tank.
I just say tank, RTA or RBA. With current technology there isn't really any need to differentiate beyond that IMO
OK! Time for my! I started vaping with a cigalike just over a year ago, then I went to an ego style tank using +1ohm coils. after that I got an Aerotank which used the same coils! Then I got a Sub-tank mini with an RBA (non specific Rebuildable Base? Atomizer). After that I bought a Mutation X V4 RDA(very specific Rebuildable Dripping Atomizes). Finally I got a Mutation MT RebuildableTank Atomizer (again very specific)!
So from My experience IMHO Atomizing devices should have the following names;
RDA=REBUILDABLE DRIPPING ATOMIZER
RTA=REBUILDABLE TANK ATOMIZER
PCTA=PREMADE COIL TANK ATOMIZER
RBA = Rebuildable atomizer. RBA isn't used much anymore in referring to atties since the invention of so many different types of rebuildables.As far as RBA IDK! But I do know that I could run one in my PCTA!
Clearomizer.I've read alot on this subject, and there still seems to be alot of linguistic confusion here.
What should you accurately call a glass and stainless steel tank atomizer that comes with replaceable organic cotton coils that thread onto the chimney? I see alot of people refer to them as RTA's but this makes zero sense to me as half of them aren't rebuildable at all, and the OTHER half that are require the purchase of a specialty RBA coil head that screws onto the chimney to rebuild them and even these don't have decks with posts/postholes? Calling a glass and steel tank atomizer like the joyetech cubis an "RTA" makes absolutely ZERO SENSE to me, so why does everyone keep doing it?
IMHO the most accurate description for this type of tank should be 'glassomizer' as it was the all glass and steel aspire nautilus that first/originally came out with this type of top threaded non-silica wick coil head (originally using silica or ceramic type wool material and later updating to organic cotton, making these OCC coils popular?) Wasn't the aspire nautilus technically a 'glassomizer' guys? Or do I have my history and nomenclature wrong?
Now it could also be argued that an OCC coil head is basically a mini cartomizer as a cartomizer is basically a vertical metal tube with an often vertical coil in the center surrounded by cotton or polyfil, and so a joyetech cubis could be called a cartotank more accurately than it could be called an RTA, but I think glassomizer makes more sense, doesn't it?
What do you guys think about this? Why do people keep calling these types of tanks RTA's and throwing them under the RBA category as well?
I've even heard people refer to these type of OCC coil head tanks as clearomizers which makes about as much sense as calling it an RTA....
anyone want to chime in and clear this up for me?
Thanks!
GEM
As far as RDTA"S go I personally only know of 2 that I would classify as that, because they use a TANK above the RDA!You missed one:
RDTA = Rebuildable dripping tank atomizer.
Never found a tank I liked until I spent some time with one of these
RBA = Rebuildable atomizer. RBA isn't used much anymore in referring to atties since the invention of so many different types of rebuildables.
As far as RDTA"S go I personally only know of 2 that I would classify as that, because they use a TANK above the RDA!
1) The Big Dripper by Sub Ohn Innovations
2) Authentic Vape Fuel Dripper by TKO vapers
![]()
I actually own the 22mm version of this RDTA & it's more of a novelty than something to be an ADV! The tank is way too small & as often as you have to refill you might as well use an RDA!
For me I'm a simple kind of guy & I don't really care what you choose to call our ATOMIZING devices as long as they're simple & descriptive! The only things I would like to see us stop using are Clearomizer & Cartomizer because these are very vague descriptions & not everybody will understand what they are describing without extensive explaination!![]()
As far as RDTA"S go I personally only know of 2 that I would classify as that, because they use a TANK above the RDA!
1) The Big Dripper by Sub Ohn Innovations
2) Authentic Vape Fuel Dripper by TKO vapers
I actually own the 22mm version of this RDTA & it's more of a novelty than something to be an ADV! The tank is way too small & as often as you have to refill you might as well use an RDA!
For me I'm a simple kind of guy & I don't really care what you choose to call our ATOMIZING devices as long as they're simple & descriptive! The only things I would like to see us stop using are Clearomizer & Cartomizer because these are very vague descriptions & not everybody will understand what they are describing without extensive explaination!![]()