Virgin Vapor - Diacetyl

Status
Not open for further replies.

sparkky1

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 8, 2014
3,429
2,686
Nashville
that's actually a good idea.



It's all "opinion" at this point, Sparkky. Dr. F did have some concerns.

But here's the bottom line: A consumer has every right to know about a product they are inhaling. I can tell you I've dropped some pretty serious $$ with ejuice vendors over the years. That is really all many people whose "opinion" is that they do NOT want to vape diketones.

THAT shouldn't turn into a debate. I ask the same thing of my pet food manufacturer, my pharmacist re: medications, and I read food labels and if they are not clear I call the manufacturer.

Darn straight I have a right to ASK these things.

I just think it's funny when vendors stonewall by not *really* answering. It's like getting the brush off. I personally wouldn't deal with a vendor like that.

anyway, that has been MY stance all along.....transparency to the consumer, who is purchasing a product. I don't care who vapes diketones. I don't even care if they're in 95% of eliquid.

Some people want to vape the 5% that DOESN'T have it.

Ingesting food / beverage / medication has absolutely no bearing by comparison to heating & inhaling artificial flavorings, how do you suppose BT gets out of so many major law suits, by listing all of the amounts of ingredients ? ask away whats in it and hear what your answer will be, you are vaping toxic chemicals, how does being "transparent" help make it "safer" ? Do you even care to know what substitutes your now inhaling while "demanding better" ?
Debate ? your spreading "false hope" (non scientific study's showing results) claiming diketone free juice is a safer alternative, the amount ( % ) of flavoring in the mix as well as temperature at which your inhaling have more to do with flavorings related disease than anything or contact the American Thoracic Society / flavourart as I did and educate yourself.
 

sparkky1

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 8, 2014
3,429
2,686
Nashville
Remind me again how many years it took to determine/assess bodily damage from cigarettes.

I'm pretty sure it was more than two to three years, wasn't it?

I don't think anything is harmless. That is why I am always looking to reduce my risk, and practice the best "harm reduction" that I can get to. And, as a consumer, I am going to make those decisions based on what I think is best for ME.

Ahh ........... are we talking about flavorings related disease (lung failure) or COPD / cancer from cigarettes ?
The studys I looked at from factory workers contracting flavoring related disease happened within six to 12 months, some were just temporary employees.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread