I have been using a mech of some type for the past few months and I notice a lot of people in various threads talking about their mods "hitting harder" out of the box, etc. etc.
so my question is:
what is the basis one uses to determine how "hard" their mech hits when comparing it to another mech? I know that the mod itself is a variable when considering performance, but isn't it just a fraction of the overall equation? Am I mistaken to assume that- unless the total parts involved (battery, coil, mod, contacts and condition) in the final setup are identical in every single way, there is no true way to make this claim with any sort of accuracy?
Are we talking solid measurements with meters under load or just the way it feels to the user? Why is it that 7 times out of 10 someone recommends a high-end mod over a budget mech because it "hits harder"? Is it because paying a premium price gives a sense that it SHOULD perform better, thus laying the groundwork to a claim that is unfounded and more akin to the placebo effect?
I would like opinions from all, but mostly those who make or have made the claim that their mech "hits harder" than mod X, and what the basis is for the claim. Clone or brand bashing is not what I'm after here- that pissing match can be found in almost every other thread- just some points of view on the subject to satisfy my own curiosity.
Thanks in advance!
so my question is:
what is the basis one uses to determine how "hard" their mech hits when comparing it to another mech? I know that the mod itself is a variable when considering performance, but isn't it just a fraction of the overall equation? Am I mistaken to assume that- unless the total parts involved (battery, coil, mod, contacts and condition) in the final setup are identical in every single way, there is no true way to make this claim with any sort of accuracy?
Are we talking solid measurements with meters under load or just the way it feels to the user? Why is it that 7 times out of 10 someone recommends a high-end mod over a budget mech because it "hits harder"? Is it because paying a premium price gives a sense that it SHOULD perform better, thus laying the groundwork to a claim that is unfounded and more akin to the placebo effect?
I would like opinions from all, but mostly those who make or have made the claim that their mech "hits harder" than mod X, and what the basis is for the claim. Clone or brand bashing is not what I'm after here- that pissing match can be found in almost every other thread- just some points of view on the subject to satisfy my own curiosity.
Thanks in advance!