Back to school for you. Really, this is high school physics, and you're wrong.
Are you suggesting that with a sufficient amount of e-cig coil wire wrapped around an iron core that we could make an electromagnet?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Back to school for you. Really, this is high school physics, and you're wrong.
No. I'm stating as a matter of scientific fact that when you put a current through a wire, you generate a magnetic field. And if that wire is formed into a coil, the magnetic field is increased. No core is necessary to create a magnetic field, although having one increases the strength even further.Are you suggesting that with a sufficient amount of e-cig coil wire wrapped around an iron core that we could make an electromagnet?
uhhhh most speaker coils are copper or aluminum wire, no magnet wire is used, but this is why the former for the coil is set inside a magnet. as the ac signal is passed through the coil it creates a magnetic force and drives the cone back and forth against the magnetic force of the magnet it is set in. the accuracy of a speaker is directy related to the strength of this magnet and is why you see 5 lb mags on huge bass speakers.
spend some time on parts express to see how speakers are built.
Why not study even basic physics a bit before you embarrass yourself further?The magnetic field of resistance wire is going to be minuscule in comparison to that of proper magnet wire. And, given the same power source, the field will get weaker the longer you make the coil due to the exponential drop in current, which is the exact opposite effect you would see from insulated magnet wire whose fields would increase in strength.
Why not study even basic physics a bit before you embarrass yourself further?
Magnetic fields strength is due only to the current through a wire (Biot–Savart law). The type of wire makes absolutely no difference (although some may be able to carry more current than others before melting, and for that reason alone be able to generate more of a field). In fact, the SI unit for magnetic field strength, the Tesla, is derived from the Ampere. There is no "exponential drop in current," current is the identical through every part of a series circuit.
You provided an alternate explanation without an explanation.
Wow.
Anybody got a smoke?
So...is the sputter (rattlesnake) and spitting juice of a 33.3 mod caused by the 6v power spikes and temperature fluctuation, or by magnetic fields? I need to know. It's vital for my research into death rays.
That's hilarious. Okay, time to shut the argument down.All I know is I hung some Brilliant COPYRIGHTDMCA off the AudioQuest Diamond HDMI cable I have wrapped around my Ego, and it vapes just like a Provari now!
(Sorry, couldn't resist...)
I've been following along for a little while and since things have calmed down a bit (and I was reminded of this thread in another thread), I'll weigh in from an un-bias (I dont own a mainstream VV/WW mod) and scientific view.
There is good relevance to the frequency argument. The word that you all are missing is Joule. It is a measurement of heat defined as:
1 watt x 1 second = 1 joule(J)
First the VAMO (or any other 33Hz mod)
Assumptions:
Set at 4.2VRMS (50% duty cycle)
2.0Ω Coil
Calculations:
1 second / 33Hz = .030 = 30 milliseconds(ms) cycle time
30ms * 50% duty cycle = 15ms pulse duration
We know the the VAMO fires at 6V during the on time.
(Ohms Law: W=V2 / R)
6*6 / 2 = 18w
Now that we have the duration and the power, we can calculate the joules.
18w * 15ms = 270 millijoules(mJ) per pulse.
Provari (or any other DC output)
The Provari's frequency is irrelevant. It's a flat DC voltage with a little bit of ripple to it. We don't have to figure out the pulse time because realistically, there is no pulse. So all we have to do is figure out the output in joules for the same duration and compare it to the VAMO.
Same assumptions:
4.2v and 2.0Ω coil.
(Ohms Law: W=V2 / R)
4.2*4.2 / 2 = 8.82
8.82W * 15ms = 132mJ
So we end up with 270mJ per pulse compared to 132mJ over the same duration. If we look at the heat output over the period of a full second they are relatively equal, 9.0J compared to 8.82J (the error is due to 4.2VRMS not being exactly 50% duty cycle). However, burnt juice, even if only 15ms at a time, is still burnt juice.
By increasing the frequency of a pulsed output device, you are shortening the pulse duration and thus lowering the joules per pulse. You will never get equalization compared to a DC output, but eventually the frequency will be high enough, and the joules per pulse low enough, that you wouldn't be able to tell the difference.
Another interesting note is that as the duty cycle increases (higher voltage/longer pulse duration) the difference in joules between the two devices will decrease. Meaning, by setting both devices at 5.0v the difference in the heat output will be less than if set on 4.2V.
All I know is I hung some Brilliant COPYRIGHTDMCA off the AudioQuest Diamond HDMI cable I have wrapped around my Ego, and it vapes just like a Provari now!
(Sorry, couldn't resist...)
I just put my Vamo3 on the O-Scope and got 4.7VDC flat line trace no load. No 33.3Hz pulse here....
the Provari and evic are PWM as well
the evic is around 100Hz
and the Provari is 800hz plus
the thing is if the output signal is a high enough frequency then filtered correctly it will be close to a dc signal on a scope, the massive rise and fall of the 33.3hz chip is why they dont seem to be as smooth.
the Semovar/nivel chip is pure dc
DNA 20
and these are actual DC to DC regulators no pulsing what so ever. i do not know of the others off hand.