Vaping vs Smoke Machines

Status
Not open for further replies.

Barefoot

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 21, 2011
326
220
Xianning, Hubei Province, China
A thought occurred to me that i haven't seen mentioned - either on the pro or anti side of the ecig debate.

The media pick up on the use of VG/PG in ecigs - and that PG is 'an ingredient in anti-freeze - yet i've never seen it mentioned that both are also used in commercial smoke machines common in nightclubs etc - and in large enough quantities to create enough 'smoke' to fill a room. Whilst i'm sure that these chemicals have been passed as 'safe' - how come i've never seen this mentioned perchance?

Aside from the fact that it obviously doesn't provide the required 'scare tactics' that is!

They also contain triethylene glycol which would appear to be more dangerous and unvapeable too!

Thoughts and corrections appreciated
 

Barefoot

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 21, 2011
326
220
Xianning, Hubei Province, China
Whilst it is obvious to a Vaper - did a quick search and i've never seen it mentioned within pro vs anti debates - generally anti say anti-freeze and pro say that PG is safe - without using the smoke machine as an example of mass exposure without permission - nightclubs will these days often have a sign warning folk of lighting that may bring on epilepsy - but i've never seen a warning for those that may have an allergy to PG!
 

TomCatt

Da Catt
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 8, 2011
4,162
18,320
Upland, PA

Ref Minor

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 11, 2013
2,476
4,403
UK
Not an unfair point - tho the sheer volume of Vapour at clubs with laser shows etc has to be very high ;)

Yeas, but it's like the difference between smoking and going to a bonfire. No point bringing in an argument that can be blown out of the water. I prefer the argument that PG is put in hospital air circulation systems for its mild anti bacterial effect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread