Hello all . I'm currently awaiting the arrival of my first e-cig and have spent the best part of the last week researching this forum- following a path well trodden by many of you I assume!
I am interested to know, given the unknown long term health risks of e-smoking, if an e-liquid would still deliver nicotine effectively to the user if it consisted simply of pure water, pure alcohol, and pure nicotine. I understand that PROPYLENE GLYCOL and VEGETABLE GLYCERIN (and other similar chemicals) produce the visible vapour so desired by e-smokers, but if the user was willing to sacrafice this in the interests of safety, albeit a perceived interest, then would such an e-liquid still function as an effective means of providing an e-smoker with nicotine via an e-cig? Furthermore, if such a liquid was feasible, and would in fact work as a means if delivering nicotine, would e-smokers see the lack of vapour as being an unacceptable loss of the "smoking" experience?
Apologies in advance if my question is answered elsewhere
I am interested to know, given the unknown long term health risks of e-smoking, if an e-liquid would still deliver nicotine effectively to the user if it consisted simply of pure water, pure alcohol, and pure nicotine. I understand that PROPYLENE GLYCOL and VEGETABLE GLYCERIN (and other similar chemicals) produce the visible vapour so desired by e-smokers, but if the user was willing to sacrafice this in the interests of safety, albeit a perceived interest, then would such an e-liquid still function as an effective means of providing an e-smoker with nicotine via an e-cig? Furthermore, if such a liquid was feasible, and would in fact work as a means if delivering nicotine, would e-smokers see the lack of vapour as being an unacceptable loss of the "smoking" experience?
Apologies in advance if my question is answered elsewhere