The CDC is starting to remind me of the old story..The little boy who cried wolf...I have a hard time believing anything they put out.
Will they pay $2500 for a "better off" vaper?
This is my health story. I was diagnosed with COPD ten years before I quit. When I quit 15 months ago I repeated my PFT 3 months after I quit and it actually improved and was taken off my rescue inhaler. Along with the PFT, I did a 6 minute walk test and my 02 stayed at 96. On my previous walk test I walked 3 minutes and my 02 dropped to 89 and they put me on supplemental oxygen. I am on Spiriva once a day. The sad part about COPD is that all long term smokers will eventually have some form of COPD. Chronic bronchitis, emphysema and maybe asthma. I have chronic bronchitis and extrinsic asthma. I was diagnosed early because I work in the medical field and knew my symptoms were due to smoking. I have seen this disease ravage people. Yet I couldn't quit. Then came the new and improved tanks etc.
My COPD is here to stay but vaping hasn't made it worse as proof by my tests. Due for another in a few months.
When I first started I used PG/VG mix from not so reputable companies and I had an exacerbation 2 months into vaping. I read a lot of articles regarding the PG/VG mixes and I switched to 100% VG and haven't had an exacerbation in over a year. I can't remember when I felt this good. I now use an American company who is accredited by AESMA.
Some people are medically naïve regarding their health. I guarantee she had a pre-existing condition or a sensitivity to VG or PG. This incident shouldn't be the poster child for anti-vaping propaganda. There are a lot of things that can irritate our lungs and COPD doesn't occur overnight. I am so sick of this. Thanks for keeping us informed.
Shouldn't there be more than one example of harm? Surely, vaping has been around long enough to have damaged more than one?
most likely you have a sensitivity to PG. 3 % or less
of the population have some level of sensitivity to it.
for normally healthy individuals the likelihood of PG
causing lung issues is zilch if not right next to none.
i doubt the companies you refer to were being
disreputable. now days most if not all companies
have addressed this issue and have introduced
VG blends for customers with PG sensitivity.
VG also produces a thicker vapor which many
vapers like.
regards
mike
Although she cut back on regular cigarettes, Kristy did not quit smoking regular cigarettes completely, which is the best way to protect your health. "I tried e-cigarettes, but I just ended up using both the electronic kind and my regular brand," she said. Eventually, Kristy quit e-cigarettes and went back to just smoking cigarettes. A few months later Kristy's right lung collapsed."
Turn into this ->
http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/campaign/...risty-full.pdf
They certainly know how to play this game.We'll soon see DHHS funded junk scientists absurdly claiming that Big Tobacco took over CDC and CA DPH campaigns.
Precisely! My asthma means I can't abide anything over 20% VG, or I can't breathe at all, and go around feeling like I have a hairball in my chest that I can't cough up no matter how hard I try. If I tried to vape 100% VG, I'd soon be in a hospital, since even trying a 35% VG juice gave me an asthma attack so bad, I almost couldn't even inhale from my rescue inhaler!
Andria
It's funny in that we are all different when it comes to this stuff, I have asthma and high PG makes me wheeze and need to use my inhaler in high percentages. If I Vape it at 30% or less I don't have any issues lol.
And yet the inhaler is chock full of PG. I'm sure that's (regular use of inhalers for 30 yrs) why I am *almost* immune to PG's effect. It's "almost" because a week of 90% PG gave me pretty serious chemical burns in my throat, sinuses, and nasal tissue, though it helped my lungs tremendously, clearing out that 35% VG. When I realized it was the PG causing my sinus distress, I backed off to 83%-84% PG, and that ratio suits me right down to the ground.
Andria
Few of the modern inhalers use PG anymore, they use HFA-134a which is a 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane propellant. Probably better for me that they don't lol. Proventil/Ventolin etc.
Though there are several nebulizer treatments that contain PG as a solubilizer still. So if your asthma is really bad and you need to go the the ER for a nebulizer treatment you may be inhaling some.
Its one thing to combat a twitter account, but what about the billboards and TV ads? That's where the real campaign is at. Those affect people who aren't vapers and aren't familiar with any of this and those are the people who will be voting for stuff and who will support public health decisions. They see the TV add or billboard and take it as fact, on sight. Attacking a twitter account is great, but its kind of like tossing a steak to a guard dog to distract it while you sneak right past and rob their whole house.
Wish we could get enough money into CASAA to be able to put up commercials and billboards that send messages like "Even COPD (cancer, asthma, etc) couldn't get me to quit smoking. But E-Cigs did!"
E-cig and e-liquid mfgs can't, sadly. Probably not even the mfg associations. Only the consumers ourselves can make these claims. Are we willing to put up the money to out-shout the ANTZ?
...????? Even on the surface, it's a ridiculous PR campaign.
"I tried e-cigarettes, but then went back to just smoking. Then my lung collapsed".
In what distorted reality do e-cigs have anything to do with this???? Even on the surface it's a smear campaign.
Fortunately, it's not just obvious, but transparent. How do we push back? (More than just commenting on twitter).