Paper Slams Glantz Findings
For the second time in one week, anti-vape Stanton Glantz finds himself and his work on the receiving end of an academic takedown – this time from Dr Farsalinos and Peter Lee
Glantz Meta-Analysis Humiliated / Paper Slams Glantz Findings
- Thread starter somdcomputerguy
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 16
-
- Tags
- glantz
Comparing smoking-related disease rates from e-cigarette use with those from tobacco cigarette use: a reanalysis of a recently-published study - Harm Reduction Journal
Background A recent meta-analysis by Glantz et al. combined odds ratios (ORs) relating e-cigarette use (vaping) to cardiovascular disease, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and other endpoints. They assessed all included studies as having a low risk of bias, and concluded that...
harmreductionjournal.biomedcentral.com
- The Glantz analysis grouped unrelated health outcomes – including erectile dysfunction and fatal cardiovascular events – into a single risk framework.
- It included cross-sectional studies that lacked clear data on when vaping began relative to disease onset.
- It failed to account for changes in smoking or vaping behaviour during longitudinal studies, violating basic principles of causality.
When you look up "Crooked Science" in an Encyclopedia, this is the Picture you will see next to the description.
180 by Glantz
Censured anti-vaping mouthpiece Stanton Glantz has called for open system vape products to be banned and says that only regulated pod systems should remain on sale in the United States. After continuous attacks on the pod industry sector, this...
www.e-cigarette-forum.com
The More Thing Change, The More Things Stay The Same.
Similar threads
- Locked
