BP's New Inhaler

Status
Not open for further replies.

sherid

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 25, 2008
2,266
493
USA
New Nicotine Inhaler May Help Smokers Quit
Vapor Puffs From New device Carry Nicotine Deep into Lung
By Daniel J. DeNoon
WebMD Health News
Reviewed by Louise Chang, MD

March 1, 2010 -- A new type of smoke-free inhaler gives would-be quitters a vapor with nearly as much nicotine as a cigarette.

Nicotine replacement is one of the most effective tools for helping smokers quit, says Jed Rose, PhD, director of the Duke Center for Nicotine and Smoking Cessation Research.

"There is the patch, gum, lozenges, and the current inhaler. But none effectively satisfy a smoker's craving for the act of inhaling and feeling nicotine going into the lungs and giving that rapid boost of nicotine into the bloodstream in a user-friendly way," Rose tells WebMD.

The problem is that cigarettes are still the most efficient nicotine-delivery device ever created, says Scott McIntosh, PhD, associated director of the smoking research program at the University of Rochester, N.Y., who was not involved in the Rose project.

"It would be great to have a product that would deliver nicotine as well as a cigarette," McIntosh tells WebMD.

That's exactly what Rose's and colleagues -- including James E. Turner, co-inventor of the older Nicotrol/Nicorette inhaler -- set out to invent.

The device they came up with does not use fire or heat. Instead, as the smoker draws air through the cigarette-shaped device, a chemical called pyruvic acid is drawn into contact with nicotine, creating a cloud of nicotine pyruvate vapor.

As pyruvic acid is a naturally occurring chemical that's part of the metabolism of every cell in the body, Rose says it does not add toxicity to nicotine. In this regard, the device is very unlike a cigarette, which delivers tars and a number of other cancer-causing substances along with nicotine.

But would smokers use it? In the device's first test, Rose and colleagues tried it on nine healthy smokers who had refrained from smoking overnight.
New Nicotine Inhaler May Help Smokers Quit
 

Our House

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 29, 2009
402
25
NJ, USA
"There is the patch, gum, lozenges, and the current inhaler. But none effectively satisfy a smoker's craving for the act of inhaling and feeling nicotine going into the lungs and giving that rapid boost of nicotine into the bloodstream in a user-friendly way," Rose tells WebMD.

The problem is that cigarettes are still the most efficient nicotine-delivery device ever created, says Scott McIntosh, PhD, associated director of the smoking research program at the University of Rochester, N.Y., who was not involved in the Rose project.

"It would be great to have a product that would deliver nicotine as well as a cigarette," McIntosh tells WebMD.
Yeah, new strategy. Let's just pretend that the ecig doesn't freakin' exist!
 

Our House

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 29, 2009
402
25
NJ, USA
Although this is interesting:
As pyruvic acid is a naturally occurring chemical that's part of the metabolism of every cell in the body, Rose says it does not add toxicity to nicotine. In this regard, the device is very unlike a cigarette, which delivers tars and a number of other cancer-causing substances along with nicotine.
It's good to finally have someone willing to separate nicotine from toxins and carcinogens.
 

bassnut

Crumby Jokes
ECF Veteran
Apr 1, 2010
503
10,816
Los Angeles, CA
The device they came up with does not use fire or heat. Instead, as the smoker draws air through the cigarette-shaped device, a chemical called pyruvic acid is drawn into contact with nicotine, creating a cloud of nicotine pyruvate vapor.

As pyruvic acid is a naturally occurring chemical that's part of the metabolism of every cell in the body, Rose says it does not add toxicity to nicotine. In this regard, the device is very unlike a cigarette, which delivers tars and a number of other cancer-causing substances along with nicotine.

Isn't pryuvic acid the result of the breakdown of propylene glycol in the body?
 

D103

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 18, 2010
660
105
cedar rapids, iowa
Nice find Sherid! The double standard and hypocrisy again is disgusting. This article is written, in my opinion, in a very positive way, portraying this product, as good and potentially life-saving (a product so very similar to the e-cig) and at the end of the article, almost as aside they mention that after testing, it should be ready for the market in three to five years-as if it is already a done deal. Compare this to other articles on electronic cigarettes that have been posted on WebMd and reviewed by the very same doctor - much more cautious, they mention 'possible health benefits' but are quick to either say outright or imply 'can we trust this?' It again demonstrates to me that this is about money and protecting the pharmaceutical industry, not about protecting peoples health, presenting FACTS fairly and even-handedly and giving the general public the whole picture. If this "new invention" works then great - but I suspect BP will have their greedy hands all over it and it will be expensive, to say the least. That said, this invention is 'not good' if they attempt to use it as a reason to ban electronic cigarettes.
 

Shortstuff116

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 2, 2009
1,370
138
Bellingham, MA
Here's a thought. Knowing that the e-cig hit the market several years ago and knowing that to date there has been no credible evidence that they are harmful in any way, someone in a position to lose money started thinking of a way to counter-strike the e-cig by using a chemical reaction (rather than flame or heat) to produce a similar harmless vapor. Basically he re-invented the e-cig, perhaps he can call it the "chem-cig".

As we know, pharmaceuticals are starting to lose money on meds and other supplies/devices because of e-cigs. People are getting healthy. So if they can get this new product to market, they are getting their profits back. Being a doctor, he has credibility and his device will get swift and unabated approval. Now it is a legitimate smoking cessation alternative but will require a prescription and carry a very hefty price tag. He and his financiers will get rich, big pharma makes their profit.

What a lot of people fail to realize is that when we hear of a company losing money because of unexpected "events" like a factory fire, or recall, or lawsuit, or oil spill, etc., they will find a way to recoup their losses. Using their unfortunate incident(s) as a crutch (excuse) they will now up the price of their product(s) by (for example) 0.39764% and will in fact recover their losses in a given period of time. It's all about the money.

A good example would be the oil spill crisis in the gulf right now. Many are losing a lot of money every single day as this disaster continues. But somehow, proportionately the price of fuel accross the country has been steadily rising. Coincidence you say? I beg to differ. In 2003, in the U.S. we used an average of 360,000,000 (that's million) gallons of gasoline every single day. Just raising the price per gallon by 1 cent equates to a profit of 3,600,000 per day. Every single business is in business to do one thing and that is to make money, and they pay marketting firms big money to ensure they make their money one way or the other.

Unless it is a local mom&pop business, I don't concern myself with a companies "lost revenue" issues. They will make their money back one way or the other.

:thumb:
 

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Nicotine delivered by pyruvic acid? That's the same design as the study that was published in Tobacco Control. Here is the full text.

http://www.healthnz.co.nz/2010 Bullen ECig.pdf

These are the authors. I don't see any of the names mentioned in the news article from the O.P.

C Bullen,1 H McRobbie,2 S Thornley,3 M Glover,4 R Lin,5 M Laugesen6

Are they talking about the same device?
 

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
I wrote to Murray Laugesen to ask if the device described in the Tobacco Control journal article was the same as this one described in WebMD. He writes:

Dear Elaine
This device has not been reported in Tobacco Control (that was a Ruyan ecig) but it was tested by me last year for Dr Jed Rose at Duke University and an picture of this is shown at www.healthnz.co.nz It will soon be published.

Best regards - I really enjoy your comments on line.

Murray
 
Last edited:

satoshi

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 17, 2010
221
9
NJ
From the MSDS on pyruvic acid:

"Potential Acute Health Effects:
Very hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of eye contact (irritant), of ingestion, of inhalation. Hazardous in case of skin contact (corrosive), of eye contact (corrosive). Liquid or spray mist may produce tissue damage particularly on mucous membranes of eyes, mouth and respiratory tract."

Vick's Vapor Blog: A New Cessation Device brought to you by Pharma

Can't imagine Big Pharma is unaware of that though, so who knows.
 

taz3cat

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 2, 2008
1,180
7
Port Arthur, Texas
From the MSDS on pyruvic acid:

"Potential Acute Health Effects:
Very hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of eye contact (irritant), of ingestion, of inhalation. Hazardous in case of skin contact (corrosive), of eye contact (corrosive). Liquid or spray mist may produce tissue damage particularly on mucous membranes of eyes, mouth and respiratory tract."

Vick's Vapor Blog: A New Cessation Device brought to you by Pharma

Can't imagine Big Pharma is unaware of that though, so who knows.

Vicks, has got it right in her Blog. I don't think I want to vape pyruvic acid, just what is wrong with our e-cigarettes, are they not dangerous enough or what? There are no corrosives in e-liquid.

Looks like a nasty cigarette and like Vicks said where are all the Charities and nanny's when BP makes a device that looks like a cigarette and provide nicotine to the user? Something is really wrong with this. What about the children wanting to use them, and the denormalzation of using tobacco products (nanny's agenda)? All that just goes away because BP is making the device? Too many unanswered question for me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread