When the argument dust settles, this is left: What do we really know about the safety and efficacy of e-smoking?
Zero. Zip. Nothing. We have one incomplete trial in New Zealand. And that study is only Ruyan products. We have nothing to demonstrate or educate about or propagandize except our own rosy opinions. And that won't cut it. In any country.
Find a new argument for e-smoking legitimacy.
You are completely correct, yet I believe you overestimate the general public's respect and attention when it comes to actual facts and scientific reasoning. You can watch half-lies and bent truths parading all day on TV as "public education" on what is good for us or not. And people have been lapping it up like kool-aid, no questions asked.
Sorry, guess I just get so frustrated with it all. Sometime not too long ago propaganda almost completely replaced science and logic it seems.
Actually, I was pondering what I said (since I said it), and I wonder... There is perhaps one potential nasty social issue that it may bring up - and once dragged out in public it would be like handing a loaded 357 to the anti-smoking groups and the press in general with which to shoot the electronic cigarette. I wont say it out loud, but I suspect it occurred to you long before it popped in my head. Ugh. It has to do with kids, but NOT them using electronic cigarettes directly.
I only hope that as a combination of big tobacco money and the crushing financial burden of tar-related illnesses once America (if it does) adopts a state-sponsored health coverage like many other countries, that electronic cigarettes are called for once again in the near future.