We all predicted it would happen. They allowed employers to refuse to hire smokers. Nobody stepped in to stop the employers from expanding their policy to testing for nicotine, thus blocking non-smokers who use a smoke-free alternative source of nicotine from employment. This would even include the use of pharmaceutical smoking cessation products that contain nicotine.
We said it wouldn't be long before they picked out other groups to discriminate against. It wasn't, and they have.
Texas Hospital Says Fat People Need Not Apply | firstcoastnews.com
Dr. Siegel commented: http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2012/04/obese-persons-no-longer-welcome-as.html
The really scary thing is that for many of us, giving up nicotine results in a heck of a lot more than a 7 pound weight gain. So you could get rid of one barrier to employment by quitting smoking, and end up unemployable because you became obese.
Writing in June 2005 about Montgomery County PA considering refusing to hire smokers in an aim to save money on health insurance costs, Siegel said:
We said it wouldn't be long before they picked out other groups to discriminate against. It wasn't, and they have.
Texas Hospital Says Fat People Need Not Apply | firstcoastnews.com
Dr. Siegel commented: http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2012/04/obese-persons-no-longer-welcome-as.html
The really scary thing is that for many of us, giving up nicotine results in a heck of a lot more than a 7 pound weight gain. So you could get rid of one barrier to employment by quitting smoking, and end up unemployable because you became obese.
Writing in June 2005 about Montgomery County PA considering refusing to hire smokers in an aim to save money on health insurance costs, Siegel said:
http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2005/07/montgomery-county-considering-hiring.htmlNot only is this policy in conflict with the most basic goal of public health - social justice - but it also represents a very dangerous slippery slope. After all, there are a number of other effective ways Montgomery County could save money from health care expenses:
it could refuse to hire obese persons, who we know have far greater morbidity and therefore require much higher health care expenditures;
it could refuse to hire people whose cholesterol levels are greater than 200, which is a well-documented risk factor for heart disease, the nation's leading cause of morbidity;
it could refuse to hire people who eat more than 6 grams of salt a day; this is a major cause of high blood pressure and is associated with heart disease and strokes.
Last edited: