Sir, If you'll pardon my saying so I've rather a question or two. How does the law define lighted? Shouldn't they say ignited if that is what they really mean? Also the law on the pure definition of a cigarette is clear enough that if this ban were to include electronic cigs, personal vaporizer or nicotine inhalers- it would have to be visted and legislated on, correct? But at this time there is nothing "on the books" about this matter directly unless of course I'm utterly wrong. To me this is too ambiguious to really be enforceable.
I know it may seem like splitting frog hairs but it may be the saving grace. Also the specific ban does not mention vapor, it mentions smoke. The definition of a cigarette does not specifically include these
devices as mentioned before. Would this be correct?
I may only be one state over, but I visit Virginia a lot when shopping so this kind of affects me too. Sorry if this seems scattered, I've had a lot of interruptions and not enough coffee trying to write this.