Original Panzer Black Hawk vs Clone PBH

Status
Not open for further replies.

bosco500

Full Member
Verified Member
Dec 23, 2013
29
6
United States
Pictures of both are below. The main differences being:

  • The clone does not have coated threads
  • The original has brass pins
  • The clone almost looks "painted". It is definitely shinier but I don't think its actually paint. I tried scratching it with no success. The original is a matte finish that does scratch if you try, it reminds me of a Colt AR15 lower type material.
  • The "Black Hawk" writing on the clone is definitely painted. I scratched some of the silver wording off easily.
  • The threads on the clone are not as "tight" as the original, but they are not as loose as the cheap mods like the S1000.

Voltage Drop :
  • I tested both mods with the same battery and same .9 ohm single coil Omega RDA. Running a Sony VTC3 half charged.
    • Clone:
      • With no atty : 4.04V
      • With atty : 3.64V
      • Voltage drop : .4V
    • Original:
      • With no atty : 4.04V
      • With atty : 3.74V
      • Voltage drop : .3V
  • There is an obvious .1V more voltage drop with the clone than with the original. My guess is this is due to the copper pins. The uncoated threads should help the clone in this area.


Conclusion :

The voltage drop is so minimal that it absolutely would not matter to me. I like the matte finish of the original better, but the shiny finish of the clone isn't a turn off, its just different. If you are strapped for cash or don't care about the shiny finish I say absolutely the clone is not junk. It fits good and feels solid.
 

bosco500

Full Member
Verified Member
Dec 23, 2013
29
6
United States
first set of pics
 

Attachments

  • 20140423_182336.jpg
    20140423_182336.jpg
    20.4 KB · Views: 632
  • 20140423_182409.jpg
    20140423_182409.jpg
    20.4 KB · Views: 519
  • 20140423_182414.jpg
    20140423_182414.jpg
    21.3 KB · Views: 497
  • 20140423_182448.jpg
    20140423_182448.jpg
    20.5 KB · Views: 527
  • 20140423_182601.jpg
    20140423_182601.jpg
    20.6 KB · Views: 531
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread