Excellent write-up. Very well explained and written. And I
did read the entire thing.
I too enjoy physics so very technical descriptions of processes are right up my alley.
TL/DR: The delayed choice quantum eraser experiment is super cool!!!
I couldn't agree more on that. It would be extremely interesting to find the limits of when 'knowledge' of the which-path component actually causes the waveform to collapse. I would love to see experiments designed with decreasingly complex lifeforms that test this effect. It is surely astonishing that this works when people are used as the observers, but I would wonder if the same would apply to apes, dogs, chickens, beetles, or bacteria.
At which evolutionary point is an observer classified as an observer in quantum mechanics? Do you need to know what the observation means in order to trigger retro-causality or simply react to it in some physical way?
Or perhaps the creation of an alternate universe only happens once the observer decides to interpret the which-path component. Maybe the waveform never truly collapses but instead branches into multiple and separate universes at that exact moment thereby preserving causality. If you think of a intact waveform as overlapping multiple universes then the past isn't changed when they dissociate into separate ones and causality remains intact.
Anyway, my head hurts now and this is
extremely off topic, so.... Yeah, great post on sub-ohming!