Email to American Lung Assoc. of Iowa

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Let's start bombarding the so-called health organizations (ALA, ACS, AHA for starters) with emails and/or letters each time we see something on their Web site or quoted in the media that shows their opposition to harm-reduction. As I said, we e-cigarettes are tarred with the same brush as ST, and we can always slip in a plug for e-cigs in our letters.

Personally, I feel the leaders of these organizations should be ashamed of themselves. Their stubborn moralistic attitude is causing unbelievable pain and anguish and many unnecessary deaths.

I read the comment your organization left on Regulations.gov regarding implementation of tobacco regulations.

Were the FDA to place the type of warning labels you describe on smokeless tobacco products, they would be in violation of the Data Quality Act, as well as guidelines for data quality issued by the Office of Management and Budget, Department of Health and Human Services, and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services. Such labeling implies that there are no health benefits conveyed by switching from smoking to smokeless tobacco and that no additional harm would be incurred by smokeless tobacco users who switch to smoking.

If you are unaware of the fact that smokeless tobacco presents a small fraction (perhaps 1-2%) of the health risks associated with smoking, then go to this web site PubMed Home and type the following into the box next to the Go button: “smokeless tobacco” smoking risk

The evidence is overwhelming that many more people get sick and die from smoking than from smokeless tobacco.

The NSDUH Report March 5, 2009: Smokeless Tobacco Use, Initiation, and Relationship to Cigarette Smoking: 2002 to 2007, states that 65.5% of smokeless tobacco users started using cigarettes first, which negates your “gateway to smoking” theory. Furthermore, if the 31.8% who did start with smokeless tobacco had been provided with accurate information, it is quite possible that they would not have moved on to the much more dangerous practice. These converts to smoking have organizations such as the American Lung Association to thank for their ignorance.

Consider the Scripps motto: Give light and the people will find their own way. It is long past time for respected health organization such as yourself to start living up to their mission statements. Your mission is “To prevent lung disease and promote lung health.” Smokeless tobacco use does not expose the body to the harmful combustion products and assault on the lungs that result from smoking.

Do I believe smokeless tobacco is harmless? Absolutely not! But the fact that the number of smokers in this country has remained relatively unchanged over the past 20 years should tell you something: There are tens of millions of people who are unwilling or unable to give up their dependence on nicotine. Standing in the way of their access to reduced-harm products such as smokeless tobacco and electronic cigarettes is tantamount to medical malpractice.
 

jj2

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 30, 2009
196,879
212,800
Hundred Acre Wood
ALA's email address As I can, I'll add more.
jceselski@lungusadc.org

AHA
sessions@heart.org

ACS
infoacs@cancer.org

Link to page with email addresses
U.S. Senate: Senators Home

Illinois
Pat Quinn, governor
governor@state.il.us

Chris Lauzen Senate
admin@lauzen.com

John Millner Senate
johnjmillner@aol.com

Tim Schmitz House
ilrep49@sbcglobal.net

Patricia Reid Lindner House
Dstrct50@aol.com

Harry R. Ramey Jr House
staterepramey55@aol.com

U. S. Congress
**** Durbin
durbin.senate.gov/contact.cfm

Roland Burris
burris.senate.gov/contact/contact.cfm

Bill Foster
Not found yet
 
Last edited:
I must point out that if someone started first with vaping, not ever having smoked and then tried an analog I am sure they would NEVER puff the analog a second time!!! It would taste miserable in comparison. I don't think an ecig could ever be a "gateway" to tobacco smoking! Not that I recommend vaping if they never have, that would just be silly!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread