Juul plans on putting the issue to the voters in November. If you ever wanted a text book example of cognitive dissonance this is it- how can you have a city that pushes for safe injection sites, but wants to take away smoking alternatives.
I know the image painted of SF in the national media isn't always flattering, and there are apparently almost 25k IV drug users in the city. But even if only 7% of the city vapes, you are talking three times that number.
And of course there is that pesky fact that vaping isn't actually illegal for adults.