Not trying to be preachy gents and ladies... I just don't get these circular arguments. No one... and I defy anyone to tell me they do, buys
only originals.
One one hand... support the artist!!! On the other, ah... I can support the artist -
to a point... then it's time to get practical.
You may not even realize when you
buy, a lamp for example, that someone, somewhere designed that lamp, and it may very well be a copy of a highly desirable, and costly original. Did you
buy the original $4000 lamp, or the $300 copy? I'm betting, unless you're filthy rich, the copy.
I have a chair in my office that was originally designed by Chas & Ray Eames in the mid 1950s, called a "La Chaise Chair". A "licensed designer version" (what ever the hell that is) is about $4K-$8K. My exceptionally well made, authentic but unlicensed, copy cost $900. Do I care? Not one whit.
The designers are dead, and the "licensed designer version" poofs can suck it for all I care... they are trading off the name of two very creative, but very dead, guys. The Eames descendants can suck it too. They are making money off of minds... not their own.
Not being preachy... nor do I want to argue just for the sake of argument. I'm just being realistic in a world where we, or rather 99.9% of us, can't afford not to.
Christ... how the hell to I get caught up in this stuff? I'm sooo outa here. Forums are for fun... not climbing on the backs of others to reach some unreachable moral high-ground.