One man who makes reviews asked me to send him a GG to review it. After 1 month of use he send me the link:
Présentation et test du GGTS de IMEO reporté
If you translate with google you will see that he says that:
GG misfires,
GG needs cleaning and only if you are crazy with cleaning you can use it!!
He never asked me what he was doing wrong and he also made a review without saying anything about the advantages of GG. He also never cleaned it!!
After my complains about those "issues" he mentioned and some others about this very amateur review, he send me some photos and I saw that the brass little axis where the button touch to make the connection was black from a short cirquit. I told him exactly what to do but he said that even if he sand it he had misfires again so I told him to send it back to me.
I saw that he never did anything of what I told him so it would be useless to send him anything else to review for me.
ps.............My issues with this review (exept those I already mention) where:
1) He said that GG had corossion inside but there is no corossion nowhere because liquid not only dont corrupt the aluminium but it protects it from corossion so what he saw was only dirt from the leakage.
2) He mention the leakage when he had to know that all new GGs will have the leakage fix, so no reason to say this.
3) He didnt mention anything about how easy you can fix GG because simplicity is one of the many advantages of GG.
4) He had the SB side by side but with a tank on it so the attention was on SB and this tank that I have seen this before and it works exactly like my first prototype but its very ungly as you will see. Even the o-ring on the top cap was the same.
5) He said that you have to be maniac with cleaning to smoke GG properly even if he never cleaned it!!!. Are you a maniac when you need to clean the button and the internal threads of the first tube once per 2 weeks? I dont get it.
6) He didnt mention the 4 in 1 connector
7) He didnt mention the venting holes
WAS THIS A REVIEW?
In future I have to be more careful. I have to choose the right people to review GGs.
Présentation et test du GGTS de IMEO reporté
If you translate with google you will see that he says that:
GG misfires,
GG needs cleaning and only if you are crazy with cleaning you can use it!!
He never asked me what he was doing wrong and he also made a review without saying anything about the advantages of GG. He also never cleaned it!!
After my complains about those "issues" he mentioned and some others about this very amateur review, he send me some photos and I saw that the brass little axis where the button touch to make the connection was black from a short cirquit. I told him exactly what to do but he said that even if he sand it he had misfires again so I told him to send it back to me.
I saw that he never did anything of what I told him so it would be useless to send him anything else to review for me.
ps.............My issues with this review (exept those I already mention) where:
1) He said that GG had corossion inside but there is no corossion nowhere because liquid not only dont corrupt the aluminium but it protects it from corossion so what he saw was only dirt from the leakage.
2) He mention the leakage when he had to know that all new GGs will have the leakage fix, so no reason to say this.
3) He didnt mention anything about how easy you can fix GG because simplicity is one of the many advantages of GG.
4) He had the SB side by side but with a tank on it so the attention was on SB and this tank that I have seen this before and it works exactly like my first prototype but its very ungly as you will see. Even the o-ring on the top cap was the same.
5) He said that you have to be maniac with cleaning to smoke GG properly even if he never cleaned it!!!. Are you a maniac when you need to clean the button and the internal threads of the first tube once per 2 weeks? I dont get it.
6) He didnt mention the 4 in 1 connector
7) He didnt mention the venting holes
WAS THIS A REVIEW?
In future I have to be more careful. I have to choose the right people to review GGs.